News Focus
News Focus
Followers 23
Posts 1003
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/12/2015

Re: 1manband post# 25843

Thursday, 01/28/2016 10:12:55 PM

Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:12:55 PM

Post# of 82575
It wouldn't be TALK, UMS is entitled to 85% of the common stock, which they could've bought back without anyome knowing anything right after the merger . Again NOT TALK not the "issuer". The "issuer" wouldn't be buying the shares, But UMS is that clear? Enough?

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today