News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DewDiligence

01/12/16 1:32 PM

#11845 RE: jbog #11844

In the long run I see China being more of a foe instead of a friend to TMO…

Please elaborate.
icon url

DewDiligence

09/06/16 4:10 PM

#13222 RE: jbog #11844

DHR -2% on CPHD deal (which isn’t exactly a steal):

https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2016-09-06/danaher-cepheid-deal-shows-its-new-look-is-pricey-to-maintain

The new, nimbler Danaher has expensive taste.

The $55 billion company said Tuesday that it will buy diagnostics-equipment maker Cepheid for about $4 billion [#msg-124976329], marking its first major purchase since completing the spinoff of its more industrial-focused businesses in July. The quick turnaround between the split and this week's deal announcement helps reinforce the logic of the breakup, which Danaher said would help it focus in on life sciences and make it easier to find growth-boosting acquisitions. Easier to find doesn't necessarily mean cheap to buy, though.

…At $53 a share, Danaher's offer values Cepheid at around 5.5 times its projected revenue for 2017. That's more than double the median multiple that Danaher has historically paid.

… That's the price you pay for deciding to become a life-sciences company (with the multiple to match) instead of an industrial conglomerate. Competition for acquisitions is fierce and the targets tend to be expensive even before you tack on a premium. Deals also tend to be more focused on growth, rather than the cost-cutting opportunities that have been Danaher's trademark.

icon url

DewDiligence

12/19/16 8:14 PM

#13829 RE: jbog #11844

Re: China’s market acceptance of multinationals

This Forbes write-up echoes jbog’s skeptical view expressed in #msg-119780974 and #msg-119791522:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/benjaminshobert/2016/12/19/healthcare-companies-take-note-china-doesnt-need-you-as-much-as-you-think