News Focus
News Focus
icon url

webpence

01/09/16 11:40 AM

#150544 RE: es1 #150542

Actually, I think it does validate the Gulf data to an extent, because the holes appear to then be 50 meters off in the same direction and as part of a grid, there should be some that still overlap the original dominion gulf holes.

Truth bryce seems to know what he's talking about regarding the geology, so hopefully he can weigh in on what it means for the validation of the old data.

In my limited understanding, seems to me that it shows the continuity of the ore grades and would give a higher confidence in that respect, that if you had a mine plan that you could be more assured those grades would be encountered throughout. Not sure I'm explaining that well or not.

Anyway, I'm with you on this one regarding fees that seemed to buy us no results.
icon url

Truth Bryce

01/11/16 9:54 AM

#150558 RE: es1 #150542

"Hole locations are only important if you are going to mine some day"

With all due respect to es1 this statement is probably about the dumbest thing I have ever heard.

No one would ever even to bother to drill or explore any mineral or oil project anywhere for anything if they didn't think that project may be a mine someday.

Why would anyone spend money on a project if the knew it couldn't be a mine?

You need to know exactly where you are with your drill holes so one can calculate reserves . Engineers cannot do their job without that precise data.

And without that data a mine will never happen.