News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Hugodrax

12/30/15 10:38 AM

#36945 RE: umiak #36944

"""4) It is accurate, speculation or not, and not considered "material"."""


Sure. Then if it's not material it's pretty much irrelevant. Under securities laws:

"material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would consider it important in deciding how to vote their shares or invest their money".

If Microsoft were secretly devoting huge resources to "Glassware 2.0" behind the scenes and were about to do some major push, would a "reasonable shareholder" (an oxymoron in ANY's case IMHO) consider it important? I certainly would as a long, short, or prospective long or short.

Can't have it both ways.

Feels more like speculative hooey and hope to me.

IMHO
icon url

macnqueso

12/30/15 11:16 AM

#36947 RE: umiak #36944

Important... yes.... material.... no, not in the sense that our friend "this is my last post" insinuates... and the essence of which has already been disclosed multiple times... so yes... your #4 is spot on...