News Focus
News Focus
icon url

tob999

12/30/15 10:02 AM

#46899 RE: iandy #46898

Quoting from a hack piece? Sheesh.
icon url

XenaLives

12/30/15 10:06 AM

#46906 RE: iandy #46898

Blatant lie -


The SEC wants to conduct a formal investigation to look into the company’s internal matters. In a filing, the company stated that the subpoena and investigation to the recent unusual activity in the market pertains to the company’s shares.

icon url

Amatuer17

12/30/15 10:27 AM

#46929 RE: iandy #46898

Can company at least defend this statement?
Can it clarify if company is under investigation or not?

Can the normal crowd contact IR and see if company can issue the clarification or not?

There are articles in bloomberg and Barrons on the subject - it raises more concerns as they are reputable publications.
icon url

XenaLives

08/12/16 10:13 AM

#73283 RE: iandy #46898

But that quote is not from the company or the SEC. If they were investigating trading in AVXL they would first have to rule out irregular activity by the company.

The rest is an unknown.

icon url

JB3729

08/12/16 1:27 PM

#73331 RE: iandy #46898

From 10-K -

ii) On December 22, 2015, the Company received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) which indicates that the agency is conducting a formal investigation. The Company believes the subpoena and investigation relate to the recent unusual activity in the market for the Company’s shares. The Company is fully cooperating with the SEC in this investigation and is unable to predict when this matter will be resolved or what further action, if any, the SEC may take in connection with it.

The 10-K statement isn't even remotely similar to what you quoted -

The SEC wants to conduct a formal investigation to look into the company’s internal matters. In a filing, the company stated that the subpoena and investigation to the recent unusual activity in the market pertains to the company’s shares.