News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Charlie48

12/11/15 1:08 PM

#6610 RE: MD-420 #6604

Good post and there is nothing proprietary about vitastik/vitacig... Alibaba has lots of vitamin ecig suppliers and
Nothing to keep sellers from getting a knockoff
icon url

BubbaInSC

12/11/15 1:40 PM

#6615 RE: MD-420 #6604

MD-420 Makes No Difference Because Wasn't It VTCQ or MCIG who made that agreement. Why would international business partners be able to order direct from a manufacturer who is under contract with VTCQ or MCIG for producing product.

At the end of the day - wasn't that a bad business deal from VTCQ or MCIG??

That makes zero sense. looks like its Paul/mcig/vtcq who need to take business 101 LMAO

icon url

lesgetrich

12/11/15 2:28 PM

#6628 RE: MD-420 #6604

Assuming your assumptions are correct, which we really have no idea since nothing has been disclosed regarding this by the company, then all the money flowing to VTCQ US would be pure profit (like a commission) and go directly to earnings. Revenues might be low but earnings would be fantastic (which ultimately is the bottom line) since VTCQ US would have no associated costs. The only problem might be for VTCQ US taking advantage of the manufacturer's cash discounts or potentially paying late charges. To criticize them for trying to improve the terms now that they have the leverage of additional product line is ludicrous.

When a company slaps their name on a product, that product is being built to that company's specifications and they are considered the manufacturer, even if they don't actually assemble or create anything. Period. No company builds 100% of their product from scratch unless they are in raw materials.