Who is the unnamed "founder" of Drone Services USA Kerry references and why did she not know his "true identity" when working with him to take over this publicly-traded company? Why was she supposedly working with law enforcement when she claims she first discovered his "true identity" in July?
From her description, it sounds like Kerry is referring to Joe Flores who, along with Mike Elliott, George Purdy, Euan Ramsay and Kevin Haley, conducted an Indiegogo crowdfunding campaign called "Drones to the Rescue" (DTTR) that ran from November 2014 to January 2015:
Joe Flores' accountant is shown as having made a $100 donation to Mike Elliot's subsequent crowdfunding attempt named "Drones 4 Hawaii" conducted through Go Fund Me in February 2015: https://www.gofundme.com/drones4hawaii
If Joe Flores is the so-called "founder" with whom she was working starting in February 2015, I'm not sure why his "true identity" would be a mystery as his relationship with Drone Services USA and DTTR was and is evident in his social media profiles and posts/tweets:
Flores touted PVEC stock in 2014 though his Twitter account, which currently uses the handle of @DroneDeveloper but apparently previously used @34thArmor (http://twicsy.com/u/34thArmor). This may explain why Kerry claims that she first communicated with him via telephone in early and mid 2014 which was during her time as Director of Internal Operations for PV Enterprises International (PVEC).
Interestingly the DTTR Indegogo fund-raising campaign was conducted in partnership with penny stock company Imagination TV (IMTV). Did anyone involved with DTTR own stock in that company as well? http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=64525805
Perhaps I misunderstand Kerry's informal emailed rebuttal, but it sounds like she is claiming that she and Peter Villiotis disclosed the Wells Notice as well as the details in the responding Wells Submission to the person she calls the "founder" and that he is the one who didn't disclose such a material issue with those who were appointed to the BOD and took over the company.
I recall that in the brief phone conversation I had with Mike Elliott on 4/20/15, he told me that Kerry Thacker was their "agent" and to call her with any questions:
The term "agent" was interesting and causes me to wonder about the nature of the agreement(s) between Kerry and the publicly-owned company and/or the various individual business owners who took over the corporation.
Was Kerry an "agent" for PV Enterprises International as a public corporation owned by shareholders or an agent representing the individuals who were looking into taking over the corporation? Was she acting as a dual agent trying to represent both the interests of the corporation AND the people taking it over?
Was legal counsel consulted by either the company or the individuals who took it over? Although Simon Kogan was listed on OTC Markets as legal counsel to DSUS, it's unknown if he provided legal services regarding the change of control and leadership or if his role was primarily in writing opinion letters to the TA regarding removal of restrictive legends so that newly-issued unregistered stock would be free-trading. One of the things I find most disturbing about Kerry's rebuttal is that she admits knowing the company and/or Peter Villiotis had an active Wells Notice of planned enforcement litigation by the SEC yet never gave any indication that there was reason for concern to the shareholders who had confidence in her trustworthiness and may have bought more shares or continued to hold as a result. The shareholders who trusted her are the ones she most seriously betrayed IMO.
I expect the SEC will continue to investigate the company and people involved -- especially now that the entire BOD has resigned alleging the company's "consultant" and its former management of fraud and declaring as unreliable all financial statements issued subsequent to the filing of Form 15 to de-register the stock on 10/4/2007.
Additionally, I continue to be most interested in who received and was selling the new free-trading shares immediately after the reverse split during the approximately one-month period before the new shares were delivered to the brokerage accounts of retail shareholders who held in street name. The "Open Letter to Shareholders" issued by the (now former) Board of Directors may give a hint.
Regardless of any lack of disclosure about the company by Kerry Thacker, Peter Villiotis or others, the people who took over the company as directors and officers accepted a legal fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the common shareholders. Although they may be trying to appear noble by resigning and giving at least some disclosure that the company has huge problems, at minimum they were incredibly naive and ill-equipped to take over a public company. It should not have taken so many months for them to ring the bell given the numerous press releases, tweets and other communications that touted the company with information that now appears to have been false and misleading all along.
Hopefully the truth of this mess will be publicly revealed in time. The people who own the company - its common shareholders -- have a right to know exactly what happened.
Could you email Kerry and ask here about the Reverse Merger? They said it never happened and she said it did. We are curious as to what here response may be. We appreciate all of your help, your great relationship with here could answer a lot of questions for us. Was DSUS on the door when you visited?