Thanks. And I appreciate the pleasant tone. I think this room needs more of that, and I hope that doesn't sound condescending. And I also apology if I have given offence in anything I have said.
What I'm pointing to is the issue of using a non transferable item as collateral, and then executing and transferring it. I guess anything is possible, especially with consent of the issuer. So I come back to my question about HPs answer. What does HP say?
I'm not sure of the implications but I think they are worth considering. I also think it would have been best to settle. But presumably that was tried before the lawsuit was filed.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
