Thanks and that is why I ALWAYS SAY "IF THERE ARE ANY ASSETS"
Honestly I think any such return would get as much coverage as the seizure did itself , NONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pard this thing had a media WIDE HANDS OFF!!!!!!!!!!
Also think about this you say law suits ect right , didn't all CREDITORS HAVE THEIR DAY in court to prove or try to PROVE THEIR CLAIMS???????? Arn'et those that did paid ??????????
Now go a step further COULD ANY SHARE HOLDERS have done what we collectively did , HOLD THEIR SHARES and sign a waiver??????????
Ye any of them could have,now if THEY CHOOSE NOT to please tell me what recourse they would have or what judge would even entertain hearing their cases???????? NOT ONE as it would go like this did you sell your shares and if you didn't did you sign a waiver???????
Those that choose are still here and still part of this deal , any that ON THEIR OWN ACCORD choose to either sell or not sign a waiver ,CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH.............Honestly I see no way there would be lawsuit one and if so , please explain to me on what grounds it would be filed or fought.
All if here or not had the exact same OPTIONS to choose from some stayed some split some waved some didn't
Oh and back to WAMU to this very day you hear of ALL the other banks ,but never hear word one of WAMU,splain me WHYS THAT??????
Ask shela she can tell ya ,cause she told us all 3 weeks after the seizure when she went before congress and congress has since CREATED A NEW LAW to allow what they did before illegally to NOW BE LEGAL...........
SET IT AND FORGET IT is gonna be my rule till this is done signed sealed and over!!!!!!!!!!! and YES SIR till then I hold hope , but ZERO expectations at all
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
