News Focus
News Focus
icon url

copperslash

08/19/15 4:46 PM

#59947 RE: copperslash #59946

So the damages in SDNY case will only be related to the NDA breach, but the NDA breach hurt V's negotiating position with all of the companies not yet licensing V's essential patents. If V's terms are $1 smartphone, .50 handsets, etc., then these damages could be 100 million and upward with very likely triple damages and sanctions.

Am I right to say that Z could be on the hook for 300M to ??? and this doesn't even include the licensing of the essential patents which Z admitted could be 800M over the life of the patents?
icon url

Giovinco

08/19/15 6:14 PM

#59953 RE: copperslash #59946

copperslash what part of 'Kaplan already ruled ZTE had violated the NDA' is not clear ?

I think it's been explained 1 hundred times

In an order released April 6, 2015, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan granted Vringo`s motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to the question of whether or not ZTE breached the NDA entered into by the parties.