News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Molybucks

08/02/15 7:37 PM

#6893 RE: spaceman144 #6892

From my point of view;

Both parties have signed off on settlement discussions-to be clear this was not mandatory.
The Judge plays a big part in trying to resolving the dispute. He may elect to talk and / or advise either party separately or together.
He has had to have done his homework as well. Meaning, seeking third party review of valuations being fought over. Todays worth of Advisory's business and Funds contested 60 percent of it. Valuation of past 4 years earnings and potential future earnings as well.
I still content Advisory needs to get Fund completely out of the picture for a multitude of reasons. First and foremost would be the risk of giving up controlling interest in Advisory's business and the associated comfy jobs at risk.

All in my humble opinion of course.....
icon url

CansoSpaceMan

08/03/15 12:23 AM

#6901 RE: spaceman144 #6892

Game is on here, the judge needs to put the heat on.