News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MattySR

07/26/15 5:54 PM

#32218 RE: HunterFThompson #32213

Ridiculous not to.



Right so lets agree to disagree.

Why does the Mesa fab consume 250000$ in energy a month pointing to 5M+ KWh including solar? What does the fab need water for?



Source?

Nice tax credit. Apple can pay for it as they had been supposed to under the original agreement. Leverage remains unchanged. [/quote

Hmm seems like Apple has wanted nothing to do with this equipment. GTATs last auction left a lot of core fab equipment unbidded for.

Who cares. That's R&D equipment.



Alright, Agreed.

Sleezy US lawyers do. Legal conclusions only. Testing, R&D, and expenses make the fact that there had at least something on a minor scale been produced really obvious.



I am arguing that there are not even two dots to connect pointing to GTAT still producing boules at mesa. For sure not in Salem. I am saying all the Furnaces are turned off and primed to sell. (Rejected/expired 4 leases)

as for the sleezy lawyer thing, true to some extent, but I still believe you are connecting dots that are not their.

Show me more proof/evidence/DD to support that GTAT has its furnaces running in mesa still, if you wish.

That's your dots.



Again, agree to disagree. I gave you ample proof that GTAT is not producing boules anymore. I'll direct you here again.

https://www.kccllc.net/gtat/document/1411916150528000000000001

GTAT wants out of the sapphire material production business.

See? Fits within my picture.



Wait I don't understand, how does this support your claim more than it supports my claim??? Explain yourself more on this one please.

Sure can the operation of all furnaces starting Mid-September entirely suffice. Trust me on that one.



Furnace turn over is like 20-21 days for one boule.