What seemed to confuse me a bit was he seemed to be indicating doses as high as 8 to 10 gm daily but the sentence before mentioned that there have been virtually no studies done at more than 5 gm daily. So without the data I question his proposal of 8 to 10 gm.
Otherwise he did a good job putting that NYT article writer in their place.
JL...never read the article in your discussion....For sure, the NYT is a dinasaur waiting to die......Merely smear pieces, put out to NYT sheep.........I say just wait......Wait till reduce-it, and all these idiots will be touting EPA to the high heavens!!!!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
