Replies to post #188996 on Biotech Values

[goodJohnhunting]

So was the "self-sabotage" schtick!

In the past people complained that Peregrine swept everything under the rug, (Duke Paper, HCV data, Breast, Cotara, on and on..).

Why wouldn't they just do the same with the PhaseII debacle?

But instead let's take this to trial, and all the while know that you ordered the sabotage?

Makes no sense to me..

All the best,
John

[vinmantoo]

{{The poor PPHM begin taken down by a conspiracy of big pharmas schtick was old the first time it was raised let alone the 1000th time."


<So was the "self-sabotage" schtick!>

That is exactly what I am talking about with PPHM investors. Robert uses some kind of false argument that two suppositions are equally valid, or if you like, equally absurd.

The Big Pharma conspiracy idea is is completely looney tunes. If Bavi was so great, and one of a dozen Big Pharma companies could swoop in an buy if for a sum that is a rounding error to their bottom lines and that was BEFORE the share price impeded after the botched trial. Instead, the PPHM longs would rather believe that Big Pharma would all conspire to keep PPHM down by sabotaging the trial, and trust each other not to swoop in an buy the amazing wonder drug for an even smaller rounding error.

As far s the self-sabotage, Dew gave a very reasonable explanation of why a small biotech the MIGHT sabotage their trial. Not that they did it, but there is a reason why and they could do it an benefit form it.