InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252557
Next 10
Followers 30
Posts 4145
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2007

Re: Robert C Jonson post# 188996

Monday, 03/23/2015 9:03:55 PM

Monday, March 23, 2015 9:03:55 PM

Post# of 252557
{{The poor PPHM begin taken down by a conspiracy of big pharmas schtick was old the first time it was raised let alone the 1000th time."


<So was the "self-sabotage" schtick!>

That is exactly what I am talking about with PPHM investors. Robert uses some kind of false argument that two suppositions are equally valid, or if you like, equally absurd.

The Big Pharma conspiracy idea is is completely looney tunes. If Bavi was so great, and one of a dozen Big Pharma companies could swoop in an buy if for a sum that is a rounding error to their bottom lines and that was BEFORE the share price impeded after the botched trial. Instead, the PPHM longs would rather believe that Big Pharma would all conspire to keep PPHM down by sabotaging the trial, and trust each other not to swoop in an buy the amazing wonder drug for an even smaller rounding error.

As far s the self-sabotage, Dew gave a very reasonable explanation of why a small biotech the MIGHT sabotage their trial. Not that they did it, but there is a reason why and they could do it an benefit form it.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.