News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Robert C Jonson

03/23/15 1:10 PM

#188996 RE: vinmantoo #188994

" The poor PPHM begin taken down by a conspiracy of big pharmas schtick was old the first time it was raised let alone the 1000th time."

So was the "self-sabotage" schtick!
icon url

honestabe13

03/23/15 1:23 PM

#188997 RE: vinmantoo #188994

So, Vin...

if you were shopping for a vendor to handle your double-blind trial, would you use CSM right now? If so, would it only be because they're likely under a microscope?
icon url

asmarterwookie

03/24/15 10:46 AM

#189050 RE: vinmantoo #188994

PPHM reconstituted data...60% increase in MOS and STAT SIG...What do you suppose would have happened without the dose switch(pronounced sabotage)?

NY Academy Science presentation reiterated >110% increas in MOS? Is that what the FDA sees?

Was it 80 patients until the "act" was committed? Not saying approval but how about a breakthrough designation? Maybe? A year lost?

I guess the FDA approves all

corrupted phase II trial

results and awards fast track status with 2 interim lookins?

WHY DIDN'T the FDA force a redo? Did they see something or are they into risking patients lives?

I don't know...do you?
tia
wook