News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Mattu

05/21/01 8:52 PM

#2703 RE: MMMARY #2700

>>I posted about tmotq going chapter 7 on the message board. I knew they went BK but hte company didn't file an 8k about it.

So you have no regard for the law, do you?

Posting insider information doesn't bother you?

MB

icon url

Anthony M

05/21/01 8:59 PM

#2706 RE: MMMARY #2700

I have a simple question?

When someone signs up on a site and reads the terms and conditions of use, Do you not accept them as they are, or do you expect to change them for your personal situation?


A. MarketFusion
icon url

Georgia Bard

05/21/01 9:01 PM

#2707 RE: MMMARY #2700

No Mary I do a lot for the companies I IR for include being just as bold about issuing stock to promoters, convertible debentures, and anything else that is not good for shareholders.

I only post outside iHUB only when goaded to another site on a spin. Other than that I try to stay off other sites in reference to the companies I IR for. Posting on line is an option I do and not required by the companies. Just a service I do to ineract and try to keep the facts and story straight.

I have had my spats with JM ... along with others I think that are trying to rip off shareholders but I also have the same conviction for those on the other side trying to rip of companies and shareholders as well. Anyone that tries to affect the selling and buying of a security is on dangerous ground. "Tipping" is also been expanded in Regulation FD as has insider trading. You should go read the new admended rules.

I just find it amazing you are only one sided and not against both sides. That is bias anyway you look at it. I go after both. Posts without an underlying basis should be removed period. Interpretation with an underlying basis sometimes with absurd interpretation at least you have something to refute.

Just wondering why you are not an advocate of both sides and only one side amoung other things.



:=) Gary Swancey