>>They are trying to get around it by having teh responsibility belong to each commentator.
You stated just a few posts ago that they had NO DISCLAIMER. But now you acknowledge that? All I did was go to their site and look at the bottom to figure that out. I hope you at least did that in your initial investigation.
>>I emailed a commentator and didn't get a disclaimer from him either.
Just because they didn't respond to you, that makes them a scammer? So if I e-mail George W Bush and he doesn't respond to my question about him doing something illegal, that makes him a criminal?
>>who is ultimately responsible? The publisher.
Wrong. If someone (analyst) posts a message here lying (positive or negative), you think I am held responsible? No way. Go read the Library Law.
MB
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
