News Focus
News Focus
icon url

WWTLDS

01/10/15 9:45 AM

#268140 RE: TooFrank #268136

I have made this suggestion a number of times previously. Content is the next piece of the puzzle. I am back in now because the egg had been laid. Now for the chicken... a content deal with the studios would not be possible without the platform for wide demographic delivery. Paramount, Disney, Universal, HBO, etc wouldn't talk to a company without massive distribution potential. Now... Ultraflix had a legitimate opportunity to negotiate deals for real content. "if you build it..."

Look at Sensio on the tsx venture exchange. They went to $4 on a content deal with Disney. Too bad they are 3D only (3Dgo) and never had wide distribution platforms like NTEK. 2 years later and they have no where near the potential of Ultraflix. If Sensio had NTEKs distribution and ease of access or NTEK had Sensio's content agreements either company would be $1+ pps

FACT... ntek had done more in one year than Sensio has done in 5. I believe my money is safe ??
icon url

ringao

01/10/15 10:06 AM

#268149 RE: TooFrank #268136

TooFrank your missing the big picture. There are plenty of companies with movies and streaming services; Netflix, Amazon, Google and I'm guessing Yahoo pretty soon; even DirectTV and Dish are getting into the on-line broadcast mode; COMCAST, AT&T pretty soon most all the principle cable (and satellite co.s) 'internet service providers' will also join on-line TV (if they have not done so already). So yes, there is a market for internet TV, and there is also new TV products for 4K TV, and slowly growing 4K content, but let's take it a step further and ask; What is NTEK's nitch? For example, they probably cannot compete strongly in this space offering only improved video quality, where established players OWN the landscape & already have most the content... so again where is NTEK positioning themselves for MAJOR revenue and profit?

Their nitch is as a very high quality OTT/PPV video distribution channel (CES2015 Award Winner quality level). Once NTEK streams (for example) a music concert live at 4K and takes (say) 20% of the total gate revenue and grows the audience by double/triple or 10X the stadium capacity because of their remote-Ultrafix PPV TV online viewers, THEN people here will begin to see what we have in NTEK.

Many people on this board are being VERY short sighted. IMHO NTEK's capability right NOW offers a (potential) huge revenue stream across a (potential) worldwide audience over a soon to be (potential) very high content creation network; as 4K cameras, studios and 4K phones begin to proliferate (this year) AND 4K studio-philes begin creating and posting 4K video.

Imagine because we have a hint of things to come; just like the GAMER channel is already starting up, ...will NTEK build out a 4K U-Tube channel like Google, how many additional channels, how many producers want the best video for their stuff to the widest audience (they have all the tools for doing it and I beleive they are hard at work on the revenue side agreements). Then next, you have 3D video, 4K interactive gaming, etc. Remember the company slogan "The Future of TV". NTEK's real problem here is not the technology, not the share price; their #1 issue is trying to smartly manage the growth. If they do this right everything else will take care of itself. GLTALs.