News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ksquared

06/09/03 6:38 PM

#904 RE: greg s #902

I mostly agree with you on this, greg...

But wonder about this...
if she is successful in a run for president, it will set back womens' effort to be a primary force in the US generations.

I fear it will rally the dumb Doras and intimidate the rest of the good folks. Personally, I'm aggravated that women are considered a minority when we are the numeric majority and that the work place bends over backwards to accommodate the childbearers. As far as I'm concerned, having children was a choice. Why should the rest of us be put out as a result. Besides which, if you can't afford them thus necessitating two incomes or if your career means more to you than the kids do... why have them in the first place.

Let's just pray that the majority won't be ready for a female at the helm if she runs. Heck... we've only had one Catholic. <ggg>

Besides which, I truly think the first woman president will get there via the vice presidency.

ksquared


icon url

ONEBGG

06/09/03 10:00 PM

#910 RE: greg s #902

Greg...She will totally muck up the whole country, it would take us 50-100 years to undue the damage she could and most likely would cause. If it could be repaired at all!!!

She is posturing for a run, no doubt about, she's just waiting until Bush gets the economy repaired and going again, the she killed in the first place, ohhh, that's right, It Was Her Husband Who Was The President!!!

She Can't Serve 3 0or 4 Terms!!!!! "THAT’S NOT RIGHT!"