Replies to post #25417 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[Frank Pembleton]

Matt...this issue was brought up again because certain posters bash the quality junior plays while promoting their own garbage. That's it, that's all.

[gotmilk]

Matt, On Silicon Investor all "iBox" thread headers are both
saved and available for viewing. Rather than I submit this
as a feature needed on iHub using the New Wish board,
I ask you and BobZ to make a public statement here as for
reasons pro and con for its continuation on Si, and based
on the reasoning, will it be or not a policy of iHub to make
available iBox content when it is changed so that fairness
and truth have less manipulation possible.

Since you choose not to deal with my post in full, I will follow
your lead and not reproduce it here but simply note two points.

1. You ask if the iBox of board
"Mining Sector Entrance Lobby"
was changed in regards to rules after I posted?
Since iHub does not include the iBox creation date
and any modification dates, but just board creation date,
this as evidence is at this time here-say and not useable
unless one side wants the discussion to get bogged down.
But besides that issue is the more important issue of board name
that includes in the iBox a detailed discussion of purpose & intent.
I could start an endless discussion of nonsense and compare:
"Mining Sector Entrance Lobby"
to
"Cars, etc. Entrance Lobby (GEARHEAD)"
But its apples & oranges since the cars board is not part of
iHub's core, as you and BobZ already spoke on, the "investors."
Now before this discussion creates an mmMary out of me,
i strobgly suggest that you exercise your ability associated with
you and BobZ being owners of this private company and change
"Mining Sector Entrance"
to
"Mining Sector Entrance(exception of pinksheets and otc-bb)"
such that this issue can be sweep under the rug.

2. Your non action to those posts i identified as personal attacks.

Bottom line is the ability of a board to change its scope
so that the person whom created that board can limit
or ban activity that appears at a later time.

For sure the boards that are non market investment related
and exist as "clubs" with a social gathering of friends to talk
and discuss interests outside the markets should have the ability
to "self police" themselves.

Its your call Matt, as i have no desire to become another mmMary
using the guidelines you asked me to follow, in that obey the TOU.