News Focus
News Focus
icon url

skyrocketinsight

10/29/14 10:47 PM

#89142 RE: snakecorleone #89141

You are putting the carriage before the horse. The form 10/audit was JUST filed. It takes a little time to be fully reporting. Once MIKP is fully reporting then things will change for sure.
In the mean time we hope that FINRA will write off on the 211 like they said they would, once MIKP filed the form 10/audit (which they just did).

Go MIKP!
icon url

dbowren

10/29/14 11:52 PM

#89144 RE: snakecorleone #89141

Exactly. I couldn't have said it better. Now lets sit back and wait on FINRA.
Once Mark gets MIKP reinstated, then I'm sure the conversation will turn to FINRA was scammed....LOL

icon url

imiloa

10/30/14 12:19 PM

#89169 RE: snakecorleone #89141

snake, the concern is the legacy of Mark's past behavior with the stock, which led to the SEC suspension this 211 is hoping to counteract.

nutshell, FINRA needs to believe Mark has truly changed his stripes.
if they feel he is just going to dump shares into pump promos again,

unfort, the just-announced RS in Mark's other stock
(after Mark, once again, promised he would not RS until he had revenue streams)
isn't great timing for this review.

that said, i'm optimistic about the potential here, given the form 10 and audit.
i'm just trying to seed some rational patience into the discussion here
and i don't feel the paperwork gears will turn as quickly as most here hope.
icon url

dbowren

10/30/14 8:23 PM

#89204 RE: snakecorleone #89141

AGAIN, THIS NEEDS TO BE REPOSTED.

I am a bit surprised people think FINRA won't approve the 211, a fully reporting company has nothing to hide from investors, has nothing to hide from FINRA, or the SEC. Meanwhile, 1,000 of companies are allowed to trade with limited or no information and people are thinking FINRA won't approve MIKP????? Time will tell, but I would personally be very upset at FINRA for not approving a fully reporting company, that is not in the best interest of shareholders. If they are worried about protecting new shareholders, there is no reason, as any potential new shareholder can review the fully reporting company before buying. That is why finra most likely told Mark, file a Form 10 if you want us to sign off on the 211, if not, tough luck. So, mark in the best interest of the shareholders and the company paid for an atty and an auditor to become fully reporting so that he could right the ship.

Why is this so hard for people to understand. Why are people pissed or upset that a pinksheet CEO actually did what FINRA instructed him to do? Another poster stated, Mark wouldn't chance not getting approved and still do an audit and Form 10 and I would likely agree with this poster, you would have to be NUTS to just take a shot in the dark without talking with Finra 1st and figuring out ahead of time, how to get the 211 approved.