Replies to post #257142 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[10thMountain]

He said, "Judge Lamberth set a dangerous precedent"......That's what I was referring to earlier, when I said that it appears as though even Judge Sweeney is becoming soft toward the government now.....Lamberths ruling could have a domino effect.....

[Donotunderstand]

ok
Suspends rule of law

law

If the law were precise with only one possible reading - an obvious one

We would not have a full Circuit of Federal Appeals Courts and the SCOTUS


If the law were precise with only one possible reading we would not have first courts saying yes - first appeals saying no - top appleals saying yes

Rule of Law so so so so often is how one reads the sentence or paragraph etc

So when things go our way - it is Rule of Law

So when thigs go not our way --- suspends Rule of Law

Come on folks ---- not every time we (longs) lose one is it a suspension of the rule of law and every time we win one it is the upholding of the rule of law

If you believe the paragraph above is indeed true - you might check what you are smoking or eating or drinking

I am long - I think the case is good - I think Lamberth for example was wrong

But please lets not throw around this Rule of Law thing

That is nonsense - as there is a winner and a loser on every case brought to an appeals court and then if and when SCOTUS

and the decision - whether we like it or not - is the RULE of LAW and a demonstrtaion of the strucure we have - the biases some judges have (if not all) - politics - human frailty - etc

But the Rule of Law is day in court etc