| Followers | 65 |
| Posts | 29982 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 12/28/2008 |
Friday, October 17, 2014 10:28:10 AM
ok
Suspends rule of law
law
If the law were precise with only one possible reading - an obvious one
We would not have a full Circuit of Federal Appeals Courts and the SCOTUS
If the law were precise with only one possible reading we would not have first courts saying yes - first appeals saying no - top appleals saying yes
Rule of Law so so so so often is how one reads the sentence or paragraph etc
So when things go our way - it is Rule of Law
So when thigs go not our way --- suspends Rule of Law
Come on folks ---- not every time we (longs) lose one is it a suspension of the rule of law and every time we win one it is the upholding of the rule of law
If you believe the paragraph above is indeed true - you might check what you are smoking or eating or drinking
I am long - I think the case is good - I think Lamberth for example was wrong
But please lets not throw around this Rule of Law thing
That is nonsense - as there is a winner and a loser on every case brought to an appeals court and then if and when SCOTUS
and the decision - whether we like it or not - is the RULE of LAW and a demonstrtaion of the strucure we have - the biases some judges have (if not all) - politics - human frailty - etc
But the Rule of Law is day in court etc
Suspends rule of law
law
If the law were precise with only one possible reading - an obvious one
We would not have a full Circuit of Federal Appeals Courts and the SCOTUS
If the law were precise with only one possible reading we would not have first courts saying yes - first appeals saying no - top appleals saying yes
Rule of Law so so so so often is how one reads the sentence or paragraph etc
So when things go our way - it is Rule of Law
So when thigs go not our way --- suspends Rule of Law
Come on folks ---- not every time we (longs) lose one is it a suspension of the rule of law and every time we win one it is the upholding of the rule of law
If you believe the paragraph above is indeed true - you might check what you are smoking or eating or drinking
I am long - I think the case is good - I think Lamberth for example was wrong
But please lets not throw around this Rule of Law thing
That is nonsense - as there is a winner and a loser on every case brought to an appeals court and then if and when SCOTUS
and the decision - whether we like it or not - is the RULE of LAW and a demonstrtaion of the strucure we have - the biases some judges have (if not all) - politics - human frailty - etc
But the Rule of Law is day in court etc
Recent FNMA News
- Fannie Mae Releases February 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 03/26/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Results of Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 03/02/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Releases January 2026 Monthly Summary • PR Newswire (US) • 02/26/2026 09:05:00 PM
- Fannie Mae Announces Tender Offer for Any and All of Certain CAS Notes • PR Newswire (US) • 02/23/2026 02:00:00 PM
