<<I don't even now why it is even mentioned here.>>
IMO, 2 reasons in particular:
1. The LBI Broker Dealer goes to the successor who is Barclays so Barclays assumes the CTs.
2. The Barclays Purchase Agreement identifies $2.5B in investments assumed for retirement purposes but relating to the number of employees from Lehman working for Barclays. Many feel these include the CTs implicitly.