News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jmspaesq

05/31/03 2:00 PM

#29720 RE: Corp_Buyer #29718

Corp:I'm Reporting You to PETA

You just can't stop beating that dead horse can you?

As I suggested earlier, I'm very sure that F6 doesn't owe anyone an apology.

And if the anonymous weasels don't step forward and own up to their handiwork, no one's going to apologize to them. Ever.

So don't hold your breath.

I say ditto to whatever F6 said. And I'm not apologizing either. Unless the anonymous ones step forward and apologize to everyone here first.

So let's see if they are MEN ENOUGH to stand up and admit who they are before you impugn the virility of others on their behalf.

BTW: Who appointed you their spokesperson? And why are you so incensed on their behalf?

You just cast more and more suspicion on yourself all the time!
icon url

mschere

05/31/03 2:31 PM

#29730 RE: Corp_Buyer #29718

Two Question..1.If you currently own 10% of the fully diluted shares of IDCC..What percent will you have by year end 2003 if Managements succeeds in their Proxy vote and you fail to add to your position?

2..Now the hard question..Could you express in DOLLAR TERMS..What you expect IDCC to earn per fully diluted share by year end 2003? Surely you have not posted THREE volumes on the SUBJECT of DILUTION..without knowing how this dilution impacts you FINANCIALLY? TIA
icon url

F6

05/31/03 4:42 PM

#29784 RE: Corp_Buyer #29718

Corp_Buyer -- I've made my take on this matter VERY clear in my earlier posts. Your posts to me on this matter, including this latest one, have been (at best) consistently nonresponsive to the reasons I've stated for my take on this matter, and those posts have done nothing whatsoever to change my take on this matter. Going forward, I owe exactly NOTHING to you or to anyone else re my take on this matter. Accordingly, beyond this post, I will have nothing more to say to you regarding this matter.

In any event, it hardly matters much any longer anyway. The anonymous ones behind the PR did in fact get the enhanced distribution benefit for the PR that did in fact directly result from the misattributions, whether or not the misattributions were merely a (colosally incompetent) mistake compounded by a (colossally incompetent) failure by Ross Richardson and the anonymous ones behind the PR to promptly notice and correct the misattributions ON THEIR OWN. We'll know the one thing here that does matter, the result of the vote on Prop 2, in just about 4 days. Here's hoping your anti-Prop 2 crusade proves to have failed.