...but I don't know if "he could have gotten more." In context, these comments were believed to be referenced and made about the "secret document" regarding the "Examiner motion and scope" in chambers.
IMO, it does then extend years to the theory of you reference in your post about hundreds of billions in loans that didn't go to JPM.
Why, because they did. Fully debunked. First, JPM purchased them, recorded them, wrote them down by $30B, and has reported on them in annual audited financial statements and in annual and quarterly SEC filings since 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and quarters in 2014 Second, the FDIC did not purchase them, never recorded them (there are other theories regarding registry certificates for MBS issued and bought by others, unrelated to these actual WMB loans sold to JPM), and has not contested JPM's ownership of them.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
