Replies to post #29602 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[arthritis65]

Corp_Seller...are you man enough to admit being an author?.......being a real man comes tough for some folks....

[rayfer]

he sure hit a sore spot ole corp buyer..... "The lady doth protest too much"

[jmspaesq]

Corpbuyer:LOL Why Don't The Anonymous Cowards Come Forward

And then we can all apologize for calling them sneaky manipulative self-serving weasels and snakes in the grass?

I will say that you've drawn a lot of attention to yourself in connection with this and provided fuel for the fire of those who already suspected you as one of those behind the PR.

You DO protest a bit too much--as well as imply that YOU do know the intentions of those behind the PR.

Guess why F6 doesn't 'know' their intentions?

Because we have no freekin idea who the heck the cowards are!

Guess what? IMHO and IMHLO (in my humble LEGAL opinion) one cannot defame anonymous sleazebags--not to mention truth being a complete defense.

I don't think anyone owes THEM an apology. What a twisted view! If anyone owes an apology it is THEM.

I don't think it is too strong a word to say that they made FRAUDulent misrepresentations--deliberate misleading statements, and 'used' this board for their own agenda--whatever it is.

If they believed in what they were saying, they wouldn't have done it anonymously. By doing so they made it clear that they did have something to hide--at the very least their identities--and perhaps their true agenda.

They had every right to put out PR advocating a NO vote. But the way they went about it was sneaky. And cast suspicion justifiably on them. No one 'owes' THEM an apology 'at the very least' whatever that means.

Again--I have plenty of respect for many of the people who take the NO position even though I disagree with them. I respect many of the reasons cited for voting NO--though I don't agree. I think everyone should vote their conscience and their own mind and what they think is in their best interests given whatever their investment objectives in this stock. I think everyone should vote--if they want to do so.

I can respect ALL of that.

I can't respect these sneaky anonymous cowards. They had every right to advocate for NO. They had the right to buy PR. But the way they went about this is what has created all the bad feelings towards them and cast suspicion and created some divisiveness here too.

In the meantime until they come forward they can all hold their breaths until anyone apologizes to THEM!

JMHO, joel

[F6]

Corp_Buyer -- the PR, as published to the world with the misattributions, WAS a prima facie fraud, a fraud on its face -- that is a FACT, and not just a 'wild assertion', whether or not you like it, and whether or not the misattributions were merely a mistake by PR Newswire (where of course, in another point of FACT, the misattributions cannot possibly be credibly considered to have been a 'mistake' if they were included in the PR by "the folks who authorerd the PR")

in addition, I do KNOW for a FACT that those misattributions were corrected NOT as a result of actions taken by "the folks who authorerd the PR" -- who SHOULD have acted and WERE RESPONSIBLE to have acted IMMEDIATELY to correct the misattributions once the PR was out, but who IN FACT did NOT so act -- but instead were corrected only after some time and then only as a result of protests by others, specifically including myself

unless and until "the folks who authorerd the PR" provide us with what can be PROVEN to be the complete and unaltered full final text of the PR as provided to PR Newswire for publication, to demonstrate conclusively that the misattributions were NOT included in that full final text as provided to PR Newswire for publication, I do not owe you or anyone else any sort of retraction, let alone any sort of apology -- your overwrought and meaningless proclamations to the contrary notwithstanding

(btw, re an unwarranted and obnoxious liberty you took in addressing me in one of your earlier posts: I am not your friend -- not in this lifetime)