News Focus
News Focus
icon url

wingswomennbeer

07/24/14 4:24 PM

#89403 RE: Kool Aid Man #89392

Engine mount position, skid plate size/location, front fork mount, seat position and angle, rear axle mount location. Dimensions on all of the above.

The frame could look different but these same specifications and dimensions could be achieved based on APT's design and ultimately APPEAR to the layman as identical bikes.

Now if Monster went and copied all of the specifications for what is basically the TEMPLATE of the bike, do you think it is fair that APT went through the funding and trouble of the design?

Ie: Monster is Samsung taking Apple's (APT's) basic design

Be careful not to jump all over a negative tidbit without looking at the issue from all angles.

GO MTVX!!!
icon url

tickers

07/24/14 4:45 PM

#89414 RE: Kool Aid Man #89392

i agree...Monster Moto caught with their PANTS DOWN!

Breech of contract - self admitted in their own case

Patent & trademark infingement.

Slam dunk=indefensible.
icon url

frosr6

07/24/14 9:05 PM

#89468 RE: Kool Aid Man #89392

I dont see how the motovox and monster moto can sue each other when there ARE slight differences in the two mini bikes. Can Kawasaki sue Suzuki or vise a versa because theres are similar in design.