News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stoneroad

06/10/14 5:10 PM

#179525 RE: NOTBOB17 #179524

You are spot on IMO.
icon url

cheynew

06/10/14 5:15 PM

#179526 RE: NOTBOB17 #179524

I had no idea you have been in that long! You have the patience of Job!
icon url

PGG76109

06/10/14 5:26 PM

#179527 RE: NOTBOB17 #179524

I agree at ASCO they were totally tight lipped but all in great moods, feeling, sounding and acting very confident.
Sure would be nice to have a summer like 2012.
PG
icon url

revenue_monster

06/10/14 5:57 PM

#179529 RE: NOTBOB17 #179524

I hate reading into anything with PPHM. The lack of transparency over the last few years make me leery about reading into the PR blackout we've been in. Hope I am wrong and they finally deliver the news we've all been waiting for
icon url

dia76ca

06/10/14 6:48 PM

#179535 RE: NOTBOB17 #179524

"... I do know I have never seen them this tight-lipped for this long. Something is in the works.....question is.....what?"

NB17...The last time they seemed so tight-lipped IMO was just before they announced the FDA approval of the Phase III trial for second line NSCLC. I'm wondering if the next big news will be another announcement of a FDA approval?
icon url

Firechief

06/10/14 8:04 PM

#179549 RE: NOTBOB17 #179524

You have been in this stock almost as long as me! My investments came in three waves (interspersed with periods of additional accumulation). The first was an investment in monoclonal antibodies as a young Wall Streeter; then an investment in TNT following the sad passing of a very dear friend from breast cancer; and, finally, an investment in Bavi's MOA to capitalize on an avant garde (i.e., upstream) aspect of immunotherapy.

I currently advise companies on corp fin and strategy. What would I tell SK and the BOD? At the moment, it would be to stick with the course-change that happened a couple of years ago: court the KOLs, focus the company's limited resources on one or two trials only, go to conferences to raise visibility and articulate the bavi MOA, and get a bonafide deal person on the management team; Peregrine needs to partner. Significant credibility was destroyed, rightly or wrongly, when the Fargo dose-switching happened, but not all is lost. The Abbvie deal, IMO, was absolutely real; there's nothing to stop something like it from returning. I posted at the time (2012) that lenders do not lend to perpetually negative cashflow companies unless there is an exit strategy. It just doesn't happen in the capital markets. Period. Therefore, the plausible exit had to have been cash from a shortly-to-be third party, which we later learned would have been Abbvie.

The circumstances today are further evolved in the right direction. The MOA is clearer; the FDA has moved bavi to Phase III; immunotherapy is increasingly validated and hotter than ever; and the KOLs seem to be doing a decent job bolstering the company's platform. It typically does take time to allow the dust to settle in hiccuped M&A deals. We had one. Things move slowly in the game, but a lot gets healed in two years.

Having said that, like you I don't know what is up -- but something feels like it is to me too. I chuckle at all the guessing by people on this board about what will happen. Lots of fun, I suppose. The reality is that companies have so much more going on behind the curtain than what the public guesses -- this said from experience.

Anyway, good luck to you on two fronts. The investment one. And more importantly, on the health front.