Replies to post #107998 on Paychest Inc (PYCT)

[adanac]

I don't know who asked who first, but I don't have a "lack of reading comprehension" nor to I restate what others post, in my own words.

Your question;
So, while we are playing fantasy shorting of a penny scam..... maybe you can finally answer:
Is the short your trying to paint one that :
- is provable, traceable?
OR
- is it the type of short that can't be proven?

Which is it?

YOU MAY QUOTE ME.
IT is the type of short that can't be proven...YET!!!!!

NOT UNTIL THE "SHORTS/MMs/YOUR BROKER" HAS TO COME UP WITH SHARES WHEN YOU WANT TO SELL"

With your comprehension, you missed my other question:

you either missed reading my post entitled
"SOME CALL IT "COINCIDENCE", I CALL IT A PATTERN" (P107987)
or
you didn't understand my 'narrative explanation' nor 'my number explanation' in
"trum, thanks for helping raise my credibility score (P107987)"
or
you call it a "COINCIDENCE" because you have your own "number required to call something "A PATTERN"

So which is.