AGAIN YOU MISREAD MY POSTING "MY COMMENTS IN RED":
Why adanac's figures are usually wrong:
In typical fashion adanac makes bold guesses and strange theories about what is going on with shares. Here is a perfect example of where posters can go wrong when reading posts:
My comments in bold
What the pattern shows is that MMs (and brokers) (since they are the ONLY BUYERS who can purchase shares UNDER .0001 are doing the following (see pattern posting).adanac is claiming that the MMs are actually the ones SELLING at UNDER .0001, at what price he has no clue but if the ask it set to .0001 then the buying is at .0001 regardless of how much under .0001 the sell went off at.
I'M SAYING THE "TRADER" THAT IS DOING THE "BUYING AT UNDER .0001"(SECOND TRANSACTION) IS AN MMs/BROKER (THEY ARE THE ONLY WHO CAN "TRADE UNDER .0001). TRUM LOST ME WITH " if the ask it set to .0001 then the buying is at .0001 regardless of how much under .0001 the sell went off at." THE TRADE WAS RECORDED TO HAVE GONE OFF .00 (MEANING UNDER .0001, 'IT MEANS THE 'BUYER aka 'MM' PAID UNDER .0001 (plus comm.?), AND THE SELLER (THE ONE WHO BOUGHT THE FIRST TRANSACTION AT .0001) "LOST .0001 MINUS .00 IN A VERY SHORT LENGTH OF TIME"
WHY?????
ALLOW ME TO USE ONE OF 'ADANACs FIGURES' THAT TRUM SAYS ARE WRONG
FIRST 50M TRADE IN 5+ YEARS OF TRACKING
FEB 24 10:06:50 Q .0001 50,000,000
TWENTY-THREE HOURS LATER, THE SHORTS SELL BACK TO THEMSELVES
FEB 25 09:58:44 Q -.0001 50,000,000
TRUM WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE THAT THE ABOVE 2 TRADES (FIRST 2 AT 50M IN MY ALMOST 6 YEARS OF TRACKING) OCCURRING 23 HOURS APART ARE "A COINCIDENCE" I DISAGREE
I AM CLAIMING THAT THE BUYER (AND SELLER, POSSIBLY SHORT) OF THE ABOVE 50M WAS THE SAME PERSON (SELLER AND BUYER) OF THE SECOND TRANSACTION. PRICE OF SECOND TRANS WAS UNDER .0001 (ACTUAL PRICE, NO CONCERN) BECAUSE THE PURPOSE IN DOING THE FOUR SIDE OF THE TWO TRADES, WAS TO GET OTHERS TO "SELL AT UNDER .0001"
SEE EXAMPLE 2 BELOW. 16,366,668....ANOTHER COINCIDENCE...AGAIN I DISAGREELOL
FOR THE MOST PART
"People AREN'T SELLING at UNDER .0001", they are holding out for "MORE THAN .0001. Some will accept .0002, but MOST got in at .0001 or more, so they want more.yet here we sit with the massive selling off at .0001 which are not shorted. and a steadily rising A/S and O/S.... sure this scam claims that there is no raise.... up to the point that it does get raised...too funny... I guess it magically got bloated by itself.
WE'RE AT .0001, BECAUSE THE COMPANY HASN'T COME OUT WITH VERIFIABLE SALES NEWS, SO THE SHORTS HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR (SO THEY THINK) RIGHT NOW. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH 'INSIDERS', THAT EXCUSE HAS BEEN USED OVER AND OVER TO EXPLAIN THE 23 BILLION IN VOLUME OVER 6 YEARS. IF THEY WERE "SELLING", THEY'D HAVE NO SHARES LEFT. WE'D BE INTO THE 30B'S BY NOW LOL.
"To make it LOOK LIKE PEOPLE are getting out at UNDER .0001", so you, as a shareholder, will SELL AT UNDER .0001 (to guess who??), the MMs are doing "the pattern". They are BUYING SHARES (real or fake, doesn't matter, because a short time later (hours but sometimes days), they "SELL THE EXACT SAME NUMBER OF SHARES (EVEN TO THE UNITS)only if you stitch together unrelated trades possibly days later if one gets desperate enough to try and make it look like a match.
ie.
FEB 25 10:59:01 Q .0001 3,666,668
COMBINE WITH 13M OTHER SHARES TRADED @ .0001 THAT DAY
TWO & A HALF HOURS LATER, THE SHORTS SELL BACK TO THEMSELVES
FEB 25 14:26:34 Q -.0001 16,366,668nice assumption but
Posters see UNDER .0001 TRADES", think the worst and SELL their shares as well. To WHOM???? MMs ready to catch the UNDER .0001s and SELL right back into the market (next tradeOr dozens of trades or days later that may not even be related) at .0001 PROFIT
AT LEAST THAT'S HOW THE MMs WANT IT TO WORK So you say...without any proof what so ever...and actually counter to any evidence
Pretty dang desperate of a theory but desperate folks may bite on it......
WE CAN ALL SEE WHOSE DESPERATE.....
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
