Replies to post #8986 on Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

Finally you used a sorta left field reference and I actually got it.

LOL

==========

But, I'm known to be prone to visit dat famous long river in Egypt... you know de one...
LOLo

[lolo]

Whoops, JJ did direct RMBS about expeditiousness;

I was in error to say that MG read the judge.

He denied the motion for expedition, and then
in the next sentence told Bus that he would hear the motions together
as quickly as they responded and got on his schedule.
And he did say he wanted to hear about any recalcitrance
to prompt scheduling by mikey.
So, he did offer a way to dispatch the enjoinment and transfer questions promptly and simultaneously, without formal expediency.

I think the unstated message was that his court knows how
to move quickly, without seeming unseemly or in kneejerk reaction.

I guess a 'split the baby' decision would be to enjoin in va and stay in delaware. Maybe that is OK, albeit suboptimal... I guess it would be preferable from mikey's perspective than allowing their 'diffusion' tactic to be mooted. Should be a riveting read when we get it.
Big thanks again to msaba and Docrew.

LOLo