Replies to post #8979 on Rambus (RMBS)

[Skeptic]

Thanks Docrew0 - no decision made on motion to enjoin - they will be scheduling an argument in Jordan's court in the not-to-distant future. Think Rambus has a strong point about precedent and claim splitting - hoping Jordan thinks so as well.

[docrew0]

`<font color=green>1:00-cv-00792 Micron v. Rambus

U.S. District Court
District of Delaware (Wilmington)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv-00792-KAJ

Better links

03/14/2006 732 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 718 MOTION to Enjoin Micron from Pursuing the Essentially Duplicative Action It Recently Filed Against Rambus in the Eastern District of Virginia (Plaintiff Micron Technology's Response To Rambus's Motion To Forestall The Rico Action In The Eastern District of Virginia) filed by Micron Technology, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/21/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B - Part 1# 3 Exhibit B - Part 2)(Cottrell, Frederick) (Entered: 03/14/2006)

03/14/2006 733 ORDER - Setting Hearing on Motion 712 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California & 718 MOTION to Enjoin Micron from Pursuing the Essentially Duplicative Action It Recently Filed Against Rambus in the Eastern District of Virginia: Motion Hearing set for 3/29/2006 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6A before Honorable Kent A. Jordan. Signed by Judge Kent A. Jordan on 3/14/06. (rwc, ) (Entered: 03/14/2006)

03/14/2006 734 ORDER - denying 721 Motion to Expedite . Signed by Judge Kent A. Jordan on 3/14/06. (rwc, ) (Entered: 03/14/2006)