News Focus
News Focus
icon url

dragon52

04/06/14 1:42 PM

#109494 RE: Buxley #109490

maybe they should not put a date on things like that...

and expect it to be done.

yeah I know all about forward looking statements... especially when it states things may not happen the way it said it should....
icon url

risk on

04/06/14 2:05 PM

#109502 RE: Buxley #109490

"The PR said THE AUDIT OF SKTO would take 30 days" anyone who's even vaguely familiar w OTC audits for UPLIST or merger knows that a co whom hasn't even made an SEC filing in a long time is not going to be audited in thirty days. Even if they had filed w the SEC it would take well over 30 days. But, there are so many items that need explained and vetted by an auditor, and since they went dark, it's going to take a whole lot more work. In fact, finding an auditor to agree to take it on is a chore, then there's no guarantee that they will sign off on the claims made by SKTO. Then, if they do file , all the audited sec filings have to jibe w the claims made in PRs. This ain't going to happen IMO. That's why this whole merger talk is just that.