Would you consider an agenda under which investors lose money buying stocks recommended by paid promoters to be dtetrimental to the IHub community?
What I consider an agenda is irrelevant. Your question is obviously slanted to elicit an objectionable response by forcing a reply that must agree or be condemned as a P&D. Would I also consider it an agenda under which investors were duped into selling in order for an entity to gain control or a more favorable holding in a company (S&D)? How about this…a group of troublemakers arrive on a board with the sole purpose of creating mayhem to artificially drive up the hit counters so that the site owners can get more for the advertising? More than mere investors getting taken there. All are difficult to prove and ultimately the responsibility of the individuals involved.
I take issue with that. The IHub community is the amalgam of its members. Bob and Matt have made it clear that they would like our input.
Input yes, final say so…no. But your input should be directed at Bob and or Matt. I submit my input via PM. Others feel it necessary to impose their will by disrupting threads and crying "mama" when their posts are treated accordingly.
Are you saying that if the "old guard" wins the argument, IHub is doomed?
That, which does not grow, dies.
David Weed
aka the Bird of Prey
www.warp-drive.com