Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,562.98
(
0.57%
)
US TECH 100
29,427.20
(
0.85%
)
Dow Jones
50,605.52
(
-0.08%
)
Brent Oil
92.97
(
0.57%
)
Bitcoin
73,507.40
(
-1.84%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 436118
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

0nceinalifetime

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 762
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2003

0nceinalifetime

Re: mschere post# 23373

Wednesday, 05/07/2003 10:38:48 AM

Wednesday, May 07, 2003 10:38:48 AM

Post# of 436118
Mschere, Qualcomm has been recording 3G royalties for over a year or more. If IDCC has royalty bearing IPR in all 3G standards then why are they so far behind Qualcomm in accounting for these royalties?

Hint: It's not that IDCC considers CDMA2000 as 2.5G. Contrary to IDCC bulls long-time contention that all narrowband CDMA was 2.5G technology, we now see that even Interdigital puts CDMA2000 squarely in 3G. So why the disparity in royalties?

Once

The best way to convince a fool that he is wrong is to let him have his own way.

~ ~ ~ Josh Billings

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News