Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,772.60
(
2.35%
)
US TECH 100
24,233.20
(
2.93%
)
Dow Jones
47,783.99
(
2.57%
)
Brent Oil
93.71
(
-7.42%
)
Bitcoin
71,376.00
(
-0.85%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 435764
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

whizzeresq

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 52
Posts 1238
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2003

whizzeresq

Re: laranger post# 144800

Monday, 02/13/2006 6:16:21 PM

Monday, February 13, 2006 6:16:21 PM

Post# of 435764
Laranger--I don't really have a feel for the complex case designation per se. I think that if IDCC does convince the court to follow IDCC's approach to take limited discovery on Nokia's damages, then that would be a victory. Again, Nokia's latest filing makes clear that they are only dealing with IDCC's 3G patents and I can't see how Nokia has been damaged since they do have a 3G license through 2006. Claims of damages after 2006 would, I think, at the least be speculative.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News