Rambus (RMBS)

[docrew0]

Re: Can someone coherently explain Jordan's decision of last week?

>>Seems to me it means he is giving MU their own shot at Rambus on unclean hands, i.e., no CE.<<

Yes he is but remember its already well developed. We'll also be doing the same with Samsung later this year or early next.

IMHO Jordan had to have an unclean hands phase in this case or risk later appeal. In fact the 02/08/2006 docket 708 Letter to The Honorable Kent A. Jordan pretty much showed both sides preparing for this trial phase. The thing I can’t understand is why this was an event that was seen as bad "it was expected."

At any rate I'll attach part of what was under discussion in the Teleconference. The decision to hold a spoliation phase was made long ago. Keep in mind this is now outdated information and a different schedule has or will soon result from the 2/9/2006 Teleconference. If someone has the transcript from this call please post it.

===============================================================

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9634450

Micron Technology v. Rambus Inc. Docket 707 & 708
U.S. District Court
District of Delaware (Wilmington)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv-00792-KAJ

01/31/2006 707 ORDER, Setting Scheduling Teleconference for 2/9/2006 2:00 PM before Honorable Kent A. Jordan. Signed by Judge Kent A. Jordan on 1/31/06. (rwc, ) (Entered: 01/31/2006)

02/08/2006 708 Letter to The Honorable Kent A. Jordan from Frederick L. Cottrell, III regarding Proposed Schedules - re 706 Order on Motion for Scheduling Order,, Order on Motion for Leave to File,, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - B)(Cottrell, Frederick) (Entered: 02/08/2006)