ludicrous 9/11 lawsuit - bottom lines - Some other means of creating the visual images of “crashing airliners exploding into fireballs” must have been used. Yes, it sounds incredible – almost as incredible as the official story. But as Sherlock Holmes reminds us, when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. Can a “judge” who is an agent of the state of Israel really control all 9/11 litigation – with nary a peep rom the mainstream media? How long can he get away with covering up an attack on America, presiding over phony show-trial “lawsuits,” and sanctioning lawyers who challenge his obvious conflict of interest?
seems that the judge Alvin has been picked for all the 911 BS. riddle me this. since we know the planes were not involved, the images we saw that day on tel-lie-vision were just that ,, your lying eyes. the so imagined planes were owned by a company tied to enron. 2 had been destroyed date not given as I recall, other 2 were still around in 05, matter fact one was up for sale. so once again the big fat pysop, reporting now that the 19 hijackers were saudi, well we all figured that out years ago but they were just patsies since the planes were never in the air that day. so are the perps gonna attack the saudis now? as they say in the military one big F.U.B.A.R. pyops! http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=95629389 easymoney thanks -
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.