F.GEMS: MICROS to GO!...

[stocktalk]

Hey FG do you have any thoughts on this it is concerning iftp....

When you are done, make sure to read this http://www.onthecanvas.com/toppage11.htm

Here is where I took this from http://www.agoracom.com/nonmemforum/msgreview.asp?id=93048&refid=0&orig=93048

I really don't think the problem of shorting will go away with ease. Dan's news releases will continue to go ignored. This is a problem he created himself. So it will take a lot for shorts to cover. Dan dug his own hole and now realizes the problems. I think the problem is much bigger than we may think and a dilemma that management is very considered about. Before bashers try to continue to insult longs as if there's no short position here lets emphasize some points again. We now know that OTC shorting is a huge market. We know stocks can be shorted or bought long. To say its difficult to short a stock is a very lame and weak attempt by bashers. The longs have to be less gullible and realize that ''all'' stocks can be shorted and Iftp is being shorted. From the months of September to February there was the most amount of money reported as short positions ever in the NASDAQ. These trends have carried over to the OTC markets as well. This bear market is not just a buyers strike. It is short sellers shorting at every attempt. What better market than the OTC where there is no money to counter act the short positions on the long side? So, lets clear some points and bring this case together.

If you are a long on this stock I hope you are not so naive to believe that bashers bash for fun or to protect society for the better. If they were so worried about this company posing harm to investors don't you think they should be bashing their story to the SEC if they really cared? And if they have, obviously the SEC knows that this company is legit. Lets not think like adolescents and think this company is a scam and bashers are trying to help everyone for FREE. I hope we are all smarter than that. Everyone on these boards are here for one agenda:MONEY. Anyone who tells you different don't trust. Lets tie this together.

Starting with bashers. I don't think they are a threat like many longs think they are, but I think they validate short positions. Please as a serious investor read these articles I am recommending. Look at the basher named Janice Shell in this article. Is she a suspect of shorting ethics? Very seriously to the point of illegal actions. Read the below article. She is a short seller and works for short sellers. Is she associated with bashing Infotopia? Yes, So link this story and Infotopia. Please read the story in its entirety
http://www.onthecanvas.com/toppage11.htm
Also study the Stockpatrol articles with Janice Shell postings on Raging Bull. Disturbingly similar. Almost identical writing styles. Is it yet another coincidence that this short seller (Stockpatrol) comes out bashing Infotopia in full force as soon as Infotopia's stock price touches their highs for the year? Where was stockpatrol when the stock price was at 6,7,8, or even 10 cents to warn us investors? I guess the price wasn't high enough at those levels to short. So they waited till the stock hit its 52 week high. But, Janice Shell continues to beg investors to listen to her story so desperately. Why is she so desperate if this is just an innocent hobby for her? Cause she has money on the line just like everyone else who claims this is a hobby for them. She states that Infotopia is out to con us. But, who has been caught by the United States legal systems for conning people? Janice Shell or Infotopia? Janice Shell. So longs now you see how these criminal bashers work. Like the quote we all hear, ''nobody comes to Wall Street without thinking about money 24/7.'' Real charity workers would go to real charity places. Would they come to a place where the worlds money is? Do not let these bashers insult you any longer. They are after money.

Now that you have linked the most known basher of Infotopia as a short seller we can move on. Lets take a look at these interesting trading statistics and make a common sense conclusion. Please read the article and statistics in its entirety
http://www.agoracom.com/nonmemforum/msgreview.asp?id=92917&refid=0&orig=92917
That kind of trading is not coincidence. It is professional short selling.

Lets now look at recent company behavior. Was the last chairman message a message of excitement and developments or a concern of shorting? My opinion is a very serious concern for shorting. Take a look at these comments in just the last chairman's message by Dan Hoyng.

Dan Hoyng quote-''The ability to track short positions will be of significant value to the shareholders and Company''
Why is it so important to track short positions in the future Dan Hoyng? Maybe cause you are so bothered you cant track them now.

Dan Hoyng quote-''Therefore, all short positions must be covered in order to receive a liquidating distribution.''
Again another message to shorts and the obvious existing short position in Infotopia. Seems to me this CEO is exasperated very much with the short positions.
This is not the only recent company behaviors due to shorting. The most obvious is the removal of the DTC sheets at the same exact time it seemed shorting was picking up. This again is not coincidence, but rather taking away beneficial information away from short sellers. So, why is the company behavior dominated by shorting of the stock? Because the company has lost command of this stock to short sellers.

There are still more ties to shorting. Take TK. TK is notorious for financing companies and shorting companies. They are facing law suits because of this praxis. Infotopia is currently directly tied in with TK as TK recently has financed for Infotopia. Chances are they have shorted their shares received by Infotopia.

So as you can see there are many ties to short sellers. All of these short sellers shown in other cases are involved with Infotopia. Our CEO by removing the DTC sheets and commenting so much on shorting in his last Chairman's Message numerates shorting is much more than we think. Look out all the clues. These aren't coincidences. But, as David Killian stated; we have a serious problem at hand.