Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,804.04
(
0.31%
)
US TECH 100
24,309.60
(
0.27%
)
Dow Jones
47,994.71
(
0.18%
)
Brent Oil
93.91
(
-0.98%
)
Bitcoin
72,305.64
(
1.66%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 449902
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Relentless Despot

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 18
Posts 4925
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/05/2005

Relentless Despot

Re: IxCimi post# 30855

Sunday, 01/22/2006 2:22:43 AM

Sunday, January 22, 2006 2:22:43 AM

Post# of 449902
OK you stated your argument better this time around.
I see all of your points as valid.
Going into Iran is not the easy thing to do.
But Iran CANNOT be allowed to posess nuclear weapons.
Iran stating they need nukes for defence is BS.
The leader of Iran has stated publicly his desires to rid the world of both Israel and the US...
This IS post 9-11... we cannot allow threats to build unoticed anymore.
Will there be consequences to attacking Iran?
Yeah... probably pretty bad ones.
Will those consequences be worse than having Iran equipped with nukes?
NOPE.


Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today