News Focus
News Focus
Followers 50
Posts 4234
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/22/2010

Re: xoom post# 390729

Wednesday, 10/23/2013 9:24:56 AM

Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:24:56 AM

Post# of 749756
Steve Susman? LOL

Well, at least you looked at the billings. Yes, Steve Susman is there; first a brief court jest, then administratively. That's it. And that appearance was all show. It's what he contributes, the litigators are the ones that work the securities cases.

However, I had referred to SG's well documented success in securities litigation cases and asked that it be noted who the SG counsel/litigators that won those cases where. THEN, take a look at the BK team representing the EC. They aren't there. Not one of them. Heavily experienced, very successfull; but a 'no show. Unrestricted by the BK court, yet never applied for admission to the case. The crew representing the EC 'cut their teeth on a major bankruptcy and 'cut their teeth on the securities matters (my point being SG had more than adequate, credentialed litigators to staff the case, but did not).

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today