NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[stock_raving_mad]

Success, and All,

I think it’s interesting how some people continue to misuse the American language. i.e. The bashers like Air Head. The definition of squatter for example : a person who occupies real property without a claim of right or title.
NOTE: In most jurisdictions, a squatter cannot gain title to land through adverse possession because adverse possession requires possession of the property under a claim of right or color of title.

He says that NeoMedia is a patent squatter?

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9107504

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=squatter

NeoMedia’s IP/patents are not a form of squatting in any way. Now, alleged infringers like ScaMbuy, I will consider them as squatters trying to bluff their way on to NEOM’s claim/market.

Air Head also claims that SAIC dumped NeoMedia.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9107739


SAIC did not abandon NEOM. NEOM dumped SAIC for lack of the ability to execute in a timely way. They were holding up the project! I understood, and believed this months ago. Drmyke3 verified this from the shareholders meeting.

“NEOM got rid of SAIC because they were too slow and NEOM replaced them with SI. Jensen regretted wasting time with SAIC”.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8913563

This is just another example of how bashers will try to twist the truth, and muddle up a good stock thread like I-Hub. They utterly destroyed Raging Bull. I hope that won’t happen here. Be on guard. Their goal is to disrupt this thread, and cause confusion, arguments with embedded chaos, that lead to upsetting as many shareholders on this thread as possible. Just look what happened today.

The bashers on this thread may as well give up. It’s a waste of time, and energy. I will never believe any of their erroneous/illogical arguments. Who do these people think they are kidding anyway.