Yes but the jury, themselves, caused confusion because if their outlier award against GOOG. We all know in mathematics the commutative property, but GOOG is arguing they jury intended their base to be 2.8%, but without knowing their equation we have no idea which of the factors was flubbed. The may have used 20.9%, and 3.5%, and simply misconstrued the 35% as 3.5% for the shortened time because of laches. But we don't know and it's given GOOG the opportunity to present this other royalty base argument.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
