
Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:56:01 PM
2. I had a talk with Bill Campbell today and we both have some misconceptions about the nature of the company.
3. Noneof the reserves associated with the chester vein in the 43-101 report are subject to the 4% nsr or the 20% net profits interest. These reserves are part of the sunshine mine and not subject to the chester royalty.
4. This is not to say that the chester vein does not extend onto property subject to the nsr and net profits interest but no reserves for that area have been published in a 43-101. I believe but am not certain the chester nsr covers area to the east of the area marked chester vein and to the west silver summit shaft.
5. This area has been mined way in the past (40-50 years ago) and was the source of very high grade silver and that was when chester paid dividends.
6. These areas are also not subject to the 7% nsr that the rest of the sunshine mine is subject to which goes for epa cleanup and to compensate the Coeur d'Alene Indian tribe.
7 One can only infer about the prospects for this ground from the fact that Sunshine owned 51% or more chester and Sterling also held quite bit back in 2007.
FEATURED Volcon Announces First Shipment of Newly Updated Grunt EVO Electric Motorcycle Units • Sep 29, 2023 10:16 AM
Integrated Ventures Reports $3,862,849 In Yearly Mining Revenues With 162 Bitcoins Produced • INTV • Sep 29, 2023 10:00 AM
Branded Legacy Inc. Unveils Exciting Q4 2023 Milestones and Forges Ahead with Key Partnerships • BLEG • Sep 28, 2023 10:44 AM
UC Asset Signed MOU with Tenant to Build 8000 sq ft Cannabis Property • UCASU • Sep 28, 2023 9:00 AM
Goldshore Summer Field Program Identifies Five New Gold Trends Including Two High Grade Copper-Gold Trends • GSHRF • Sep 28, 2023 8:03 AM
SciSparc Announces Expected Implementation of 1-for-26 Reverse Share Split • SPRC • Sep 27, 2023 9:49 AM