Monday, June 24, 2013 11:02:05 AM
The Supreme Court's denial of certiorari effectively ends of Lovenox patent case, as far as I can tell.
I would suggest it depends upon *why* it was denied. I.e. as was pointed out on this board one of Ampha's arguments about certiori was that the case wasn't yet "ripe". Anyone looked at the denial yet?
The District Court will now likely order a dismissal based on the Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor.
Might that depend upon *how* certiori was denied?
Questions, questions... -g-
BTW - I do think that a part of this was that Sandoz/Momenta was just plain out-lawyered at the appelate level (and above). But maybe that is just my excuse for giving reasonably high odds that the USSC would hear the case -g-.
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
Cannabix Technologies Announces Commercial Launch of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) • BLOZF • Mar 16, 2026 8:37 AM
Exxe Group Advances Platform Strategy and Share Structure Reduction Following Strategic Meetings • AXXA • Mar 11, 2026 1:03 PM
