as a non-employee of iHUB, I am concerned with my potential Liability and I keep a Log of your re-instatements of the posts I delete, so that when someone like McBride decides to sue iHUB for allowing defamatory claims to stand, I'll be in the clear...
Here is a case in point, where the Libelous statements have been presented as facts, not opinions and where you restored the post, in spite of the fact it contained a personal attack on McBride (a poster here) and had previously been deleted with the consent of Matt Brown, the owner of the Website:
5) Suppliers are already seeking counsel for recovery. 7) Don't hold your breath for Rich to step up - his money is safely stashed offshore.
I didn't delete Schoffer's post because it wasn't Libelous, presented a good opportunity to make my point and because you would have restored it immediately, in accordance with your theories... In addition, other posters, besides myself pointed out its inadequacies in subsequent posts...
Still, I believe that longs should show the example and be voluntarily held to higher standards than the bashers...