News Focus
News Focus
Followers 50
Posts 16538
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/17/2001

Re: rj2 post# 41439

Thursday, 04/25/2013 11:28:26 AM

Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:28:26 AM

Post# of 53982
RJ.......I don't agree with regard to sales. FASC has a very extensive network in place for sales, from PacWest to CTI in the U.S., to Lakson and DGR in Canada, to licensees in Mexico and South America.....all in this hemisphere.

Then there are all of the European and Asian joint ventures and licensees in Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, China, South Korea, Latvia, Poland, etc.

Based on the above, I don't see where adding more sales personnel at FASC HQ makes any difference.

I agree with cleaning up the balance sheet, but you have to consider all of the items that have been brought up earlier, the legalities, the funding issues, etc.

I still think that FASC can and should explore the possibility of selling off pieces, i.e. joint ventures, etc., noted above.

As for the patents, those can be reviewed, updated and changed.
For example, if CTI has a waste heat system in place to increase throughput, this could provide for the establishment of an entirely new KDS patent with increased throughput.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today