Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

thanks, DD .. for me the heading felt ok just because they said the research to date, the scientific proof, was not 100% definitive as to a cure for any type, so far .. to me that was the key and the reason i felt to agree with the heading .. they covered about all the positives and negatives, pros and cons pretty well, i thought as you did .. in the UK brain cancer one, by memory they did mention the positive, but since all the patients died (they mentioned that was the norm for patients with that cancer at that stage) the position was still open as to the cure question .. i felt the article as a whole basically agreed with the position you had expressed in a number of previous posts, yup, i went back and read a few, including yes different types of cancer .. thought they dealt with that somewhere in there .. in case you, or others didn't get to ALL the links here are some again inside the indepth link of that one ..

Cannabis, cannabinoids and cancer – the evidence so far .. excerpt ..

This post is long, but can be summarised by saying that at the moment there isn’t enough reliable evidence to prove that cannabinoids – whether natural or synthetic – can effectively treat cancer in patients, although research is ongoing around the world.

http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/07/25/cannabis-cannabinoids-and-cancer-the-evidence-so-far/

your experience puts you in a better position to comment on whether it's
been successful as a cure for any particular type of cancer .. thanks, again ..